Cement COSHH assessment template
Assess the actual cement product and each way workers handle it. Opening bags and mixing powder can expose people to dust; placing wet mortar or concrete can put alkaline material against the skin; cutting or grinding *hardened* concrete can create a different dust hazard, potentially including respirable crystalline silica. A single generic line saying “cement: wear gloves and mask” does not assess these tasks. Copy the editable form below, insert the current safety data sheet (SDS), and have a competent person decide whether the controls suit the real method and site.
HSE's construction cement guidance identifies wet cement burns, irritant and allergic contact dermatitis, eye damage and dust exposure. It explains that cement may contain hexavalent chromium (chromate), and that the ingredient added to reduce chromate is effective only for a limited time shown by the shelf date. Check the named product's packaging and SDS; do not treat an old bag as equivalent to a current one. HSE says employers must assess, control and review exposure under COSHH.
This is a cement-specific assessment form for product handling, mixing and use. The live generic COSHH template owns the universal blank form. A proposed silica-dust template and HSE's construction silica guidance belong to cutting/scabbling/grinding controls. If the job includes both wet-cement handling and powered cutting, record both exposure scenarios; do not pretend this cement form alone resolves the silica assessment.
Preparation: identify the operation
List exactly what workers do: receive and store bags, empty and mix powder, move wet concrete, hand-lay mortar, finish surfaces, wash equipment or clear waste. Identify who may contact the product, including labourers, bricklayers, pump crews, cleaners and nearby trades. Record frequency, duration, quantity, dust level, water availability, washing facilities, gloves and eye protection. Consider whether workers kneel in wet material or get it inside boots or gloves; HSE warns that trapped wet cement can cause severe burns.
Try to reduce handling before specifying PPE: delivered premix, mechanical dispensing, enclosed mixing, careful bag opening and smaller controlled quantities may reduce contact and dust, subject to the actual job. Then select suitable gloves, clothing and eye protection, together with washing and prompt contaminated-clothing removal. A respirator is not a substitute for dust-reduction measures. Use the SDS and competent assessment to decide whether RPE, fit testing, exposure monitoring or skin health surveillance is required.
Copyable cement COSHH assessment
A. Product and task record
| Field | Complete for this site |
|---|---|
| Employer, project, area, supervisor | [ ] |
| Product name/code, supplier and batch | [ ] |
| SDS issue/revision and packaging reference | [ ] |
| Product form: dry cement, bagged mortar, premix, wet concrete or other | [ ] |
| Chromate-reduction shelf date / supplier instruction where applicable | [ ] |
| Task steps, quantities, frequency and duration | [ ] |
| Mixer, pump, hand tools and cleaning method | [ ] |
| Indoor/outdoor, ventilation, other work nearby | [ ] |
| Workers and others potentially exposed | [ ] |
| Assessor, competence, assessment date | [ ] |
Task description: “Use [named product] to [mix/place/finish] [quantity] in [location] for [duration]. The method includes [bag handling, mechanical mixing, placement, clean-up].” If the job later changes to cutting cured concrete, add a separate silica/dust decision rather than merely ticking “mask.”
B. Hazard and exposure review
Copy the exact product classification and hazard statements from the current SDS. Do not paste a universal hazard classification into every cement form. Distinguish wet contact, dry powder inhalation and dust from cured material.
| Exposure/event | Who, how, how often? | SDS/site evidence | Initial risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wet cement on hands/forearms | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
| Wet cement trapped in boots, gloves, clothing or knee area | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
| Eye splash while mixing/placing | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
| Dust while opening bags/charging mixer | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
| Dust while dry sweeping or emptying waste | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
| Cutting or drilling hardened concrete/mortar: separate RCS assessment needed? | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
| Accidental ingestion via contaminated hands | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
| Other workers and public exposure | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
HSE's cement page explains that wet cement's alkalinity can cause burns and that chromate can cause allergic dermatitis. Cement powder may irritate the respiratory tract. HSE's construction dust page warns that cutting, drilling and grinding dried concrete or mortar may create more serious inhalation risk; assess that process specifically. Do not apply a generic “cement dust” exposure limit to silica-producing work without confirming the actual material, process and current HSE limits.
C. Controls, owner and verification
| Control question | Decision and responsible person | Check/evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Can ready-mix/mechanical handling reduce direct contact? | [ ] | [ ] |
| Can bag opening and mixer charging minimise dust? | [ ] | [ ] |
| Are workers prevented from kneeling or standing in wet cement? | [ ] | [ ] |
| Can wet material be kept out of boots, gloves and sleeves? | [ ] | [ ] |
| Which gloves are suitable for this product and contact time? | [ ] | [ ] |
| Which waterproof clothing/boots and eye protection are required? | [ ] | [ ] |
| Are washing, skin care and clean replacement clothing available? | [ ] | [ ] |
| Is ventilation/dust extraction/wet method needed for powder handling? | [ ] | [ ] |
| Is RPE required for residual dust; specification, fit and training? | [ ] | [ ] |
| Is skin health surveillance required; who manages it? | [ ] | [ ] |
| How are other trades and site users kept away? | [ ] | [ ] |
| How are bags stored within the supplier's shelf/handling instructions? | [ ] | [ ] |
| What is the spill/cleanup and waste method? | [ ] | [ ] |
The HSE cement guidance recommends avoiding skin contact, using appropriate protective clothing and washing contaminated skin promptly. It also highlights skin checks and health surveillance where appropriate. A blanket glove type or RPE grade cannot be specified by this web page: check the SDS, physical task, breakthrough/contact time and assessed dust exposure. Workers need to know that a mild early sensation does not prove wet cement is harmless; trapped material can continue to injure skin.
For powder, use methods that avoid raising dust and do not dry sweep. HSE's general COSHH assessment guidance says to consider containment, safe cleanup, training and effective controls before reliance on PPE. If extraction is part of the method, specify the actual equipment, inspection and maintenance. If cutting or grinding cured concrete is unavoidable, use the relevant construction-silica task sheet and assess tool extraction or water suppression together with suitable RPE as required; this is not solved by the wet-cement control table alone.
D. First aid, incidents and waste
| Event | Site-specific action/contact |
|---|---|
| Wet cement on skin or inside clothing/boots | Stop contact, remove contaminated items and wash promptly under the product SDS/site first-aid procedure; trained first aider: [ ] |
| Suspected cement burn or persistent skin reaction | Seek prompt medical advice; incident reporter and follow-up: [ ] |
| Eye splash | Immediate response and eyewash per SDS, urgent medical escalation: [ ] |
| Dust exposure or respiratory symptoms | Stop exposure, first-aid/medical advice, investigate controls: [ ] |
| Powder spill | Dust-minimising cleanup method, trained person and equipment: [ ] |
| Waste/slurry/wash water | Approved containment and disposal route: [ ] |
Do not wait for a visibly severe burn before responding to prolonged wet-cement contact. Follow the named product's first-aid section and local emergency plan. Keep wash water and slurry out of an unauthorised drain or watercourse; the precise environmental route depends on the site and waste arrangement and should be recorded, not guessed from a generic form.
E. Decision and review
| Sign-off point | Record |
|---|---|
| Are exposure routes and controls adequately assessed? | [ ] |
| Are SDS, chromate shelf information and chosen product current? | [ ] |
| Are washing, PPE and dust controls present before work? | [ ] |
| Has health surveillance/monitoring been considered and justified? | [ ] |
| Are workers briefed and supervision assigned? | [ ] |
| Authorised by, date and work restrictions | [ ] |
| Review after product, method, location, control or symptom change | [ ] |
If protective equipment, washing or dust controls are missing, do not authorise the task until they are provided and checked. Review when the product/SDS changes, the work moves indoors, the method changes from delivered wet mix to bagged powder, workers report skin symptoms or a control fails. HSE asks for regular review and change-triggered review; no universal one-year legal expiry is asserted.
Example: bagged mortar for blockwork
A small crew plans to mix bagged mortar outdoors and lay blocks. The earlier assessment covers dust but not wet mortar trapped in gloves. The assessor checks the product SDS and chromate shelf information, evaluates dust at bag opening, the mixer method, hand contact during laying, eye splashes and wash-water arrangements. The supervisor may choose a less dusty handling method, ensure appropriate gloves and eye protection are supplied, arrange washing and replacement clothing, and brief workers to remove contamination quickly. A worker reporting persistent hand rash triggers reassessment and a health-surveillance/occupational-health decision. Later powered chasing of cured blocks is a different dust-generating activity needing its own task controls. This scenario illustrates the decisions; it is not a completed assessment for every mortar product.
Frequent errors
- Treating a cement SDS as the workplace COSHH assessment.
- Focusing on respirable dust while omitting wet-cement burns and dermatitis.
- Allowing wet material to stay inside boots or kneepads.
- Using an out-of-date chromate-reduced product without checking its shelf instruction.
- Copying generic gloves, masks or exposure figures without task and product evidence.
- Dry sweeping powder or cured-material dust into the air.
- Applying wet-cement controls to concrete cutting without an RCS assessment.
- Assuming a fixed review date removes the need to act on symptoms, incidents or a method change.
Internal link and Complys boundary
The live Complys COSHH assessment product page is the relevant destination only after the exact route, host and implemented features are checked. The employer and competent assessor remain responsible for selecting controls and authorising work. Do not state that Complys automatically measures dust, reads every SDS correctly, validates gloves, manages health surveillance or legally approves a cement method. Link the generic template for the common structure; link silica-specific guidance only for dust-generating work. This page's purpose is the editable cement product and task assessment, not a replacement for the silica guide.
Source, claim, owner and writer-side QA
| Check | Evidence / decision |
|---|---|
| Primary sources | HSE cement; HSE COSHH assessment; HSE construction dust; HSE construction silica, checked 5 October 2026. |
| Claims | Wet cement can burn skin and cause dermatitis; chromate sensitisation/shelf issue, powder dust and separate cured-material silica task are HSE-supported. No universal WEL, glove, mask, health-surveillance interval or review expiry invented. |
| Owner/cannibalisation | Site search on .co.uk and .com did not find a cement-specific editable Complys template. Live generic template owns the universal form. Proposed page owns named-cement mixing/placing form; verify unpublished/repo owner and final canonical host. |
| Product truth and CTA | No unverified automated risk approval or monitoring claim. Exact product page and current features must be confirmed in implementation before publication. |
| Copy/metadata QA | Direct answer; usable product, exposure, control, emergency and sign-off fields; distinct dry/wet/cured tasks; scenario; common errors; primary sources and gates. Writer-side READY only; site completion and independent QA outstanding. |
Terminal writer-side disposition: READY.