Joinery and carpentry RAMS: a complete guide for UK joiners and carpenters (2026)

Why joiners and carpenters need a RAMS

A RAMS is a Risk Assessment and Method Statement combined into one document. For joinery and carpentry work it is the document that proves you have thought through the machinery, the dust and the access before the first cut is made.

Carpentry is one of the highest-risk trades for serious machinery injuries, and one of the most exposed to a hidden long-term killer in wood dust. Saws and planers cause amputations and deep lacerations every year, hardwood dust is a recognised cause of cancer, and first and second fix work routinely means working at height. A main contractor knows all this, which is why they will ask for your RAMS before letting you on site.

If you are a sole-trader joiner on small domestic jobs, you are not always legally required to produce a formal written RAMS for every door hung. But on any commercial site, new build, or project running under a principal contractor and CDM 2015, a written RAMS is expected and almost always mandatory before you can start.

Who asks for a joinery RAMS?

The people who will want to see it include main contractors and principal contractors letting you onto their site, housebuilders and developers, shopfitting and fit-out contractors, housing associations and local authorities, and any project manager running several trades at once. A clear, trade-specific RAMS keeps your team safe and gets you through the approval gate without delay.

The hazards a joinery RAMS must cover

A generic RAMS will not pass a competent contractor's check, because it will not mention the hazards that are specific to joinery and carpentry. These are the ones that matter.

Wood dust: a recognised carcinogen

This is the single most important health hazard in the trade. Hardwood dust is a recognised cause of cancer, including cancer of the nose, and both hardwood and softwood dust cause occupational asthma. Cutting, sanding, planing and routing all generate it, and MDF dust carries its own concerns including formaldehyde. Wood dust has a workplace exposure limit under COSHH, and the HSE's guidance on wood dust sets the standard.

Your RAMS should set out real dust control: local exhaust ventilation and on-tool extraction at the machine and the tool, not just a workshop vac in the corner, regular cleaning that does not use dry sweeping or compressed air, and RPE with the correct protection factor and face-fit testing for high-dust tasks. Health surveillance for asthma may apply where exposure warrants it. Treating wood dust as a serious carcinogen, rather than just nuisance sawdust, marks out a credible document.

Woodworking machinery

Table saws, circular saws, chop saws, planers, routers and spindle moulders cause some of the most serious injuries in construction - amputations and severe lacerations. Woodworking machinery is governed by the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER) and the HSE's woodworking machinery guidance.

Your RAMS should set out guarding, the use of push sticks and jigs, training and competence for each machine, pre-use checks, and isolation before adjustment or clearing a blockage. Naming the specific machines for the job and their controls, rather than a blanket "machinery will be used safely", is what an assessor looks for.

Nail guns and hand tools

Pneumatic and gas nail guns cause serious penetrating injuries when misfired or used carelessly, and chisels, hand saws and knives cause cuts. Your RAMS should cover safe use of nail guns including sequential trip mechanisms where available, never bypassing safety devices, eye protection, and keeping hands clear. Hand tools belong in the assessment too.

Noise and hand-arm vibration

Saws, planers and routers are loud, and sanders and routers transmit hand-arm vibration that causes HAVS - permanent nerve and circulation damage. These are controlled by the Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005 and the Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2005. Your RAMS should cover hearing protection, trigger-time limits on vibrating tools, and tool selection and maintenance.

Manual handling

Timber, sheet materials such as ply and MDF, doors, kitchen units and staircases are heavy and awkward, and the work is often repetitive. Manual handling injuries are governed by the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992. Your method statement should cover team lifts for large sheets, doors and units, mechanical aids where available, good storage so materials are at working height, and managing the awkward shapes joinery so often involves.

Working at height

First and second fix, roof carpentry and joisting, fitting staircases and high-level fixings all mean working at height under the Work at Height Regulations 2005. Roof and joisting work in particular carries fall risk through unguarded edges and openings. Your method statement should specify the access equipment - step ladders only for short low-level work, podium steps, towers or scaffold for more - and edge protection where working near a drop.

COSHH, fire and housekeeping

Adhesives, solvents, wood treatments and preservatives are COSHH substances and belong in the assessment with their data sheets and ventilation. Fire is a real risk too: accumulated wood dust is combustible, and any hot works or solvent use adds to it. Offcuts, trailing leads and a cluttered floor cause slips and trips. A method statement that covers good housekeeping and waste removal reads as one written by someone who has actually run a carpentry job.

A worked example: RAMS for a kitchen fit and second fix

It helps to see how the hazards turn into an actual method statement. Take a common job: fitting a new kitchen and carrying out second-fix carpentry in an occupied house, with units, worktops, doors and architrave to install. Here is how a sound RAMS would walk through it.

Before work starts

The RAMS records that a cutting station with on-tool or local extraction will be set up to control wood dust, including MDF, and that face-fit-tested RPE is available for dusty work. It confirms the machines to be used - chop saw, circular saw, router - are guarded and in good order, that operatives are trained and competent on them, and that the homeowner has been told which areas are out of use.

Sequence of work and controls

Set up: protect floors and the route in, set up the cutting station away from the living space with dust extraction, and keep occupants and pets clear of tools and offcuts. Cut: all sawing and routing at the controlled station with guards in place, push sticks and jigs used, RPE worn, and isolation before changing a blade or clearing a blockage. Handle materials: team lift worktops, units and doors, using aids where possible, and store sheet material safely. Fix: install units and second-fix joinery, using nail guns with their safety devices intact and never bypassed, eye protection worn. Manage dust and waste: extract at source, never dry-sweep or use compressed air, and clear offcuts and trailing leads to control slips and fire risk from dust build-up. Clean up: remove waste, reinstate, and leave the area safe.

Why this reads as competent

The assessor sees wood dust controlled at source rather than treated as nuisance sawdust, machinery used under proper guarding and competence, nail guns handled safely, and the occupied-house context managed. That is the difference between a RAMS for this job and a template with the name changed.

A pre-work checklist for joinery RAMS

Before you submit a joinery RAMS, or before the team starts on site, run through a short check. A RAMS that can answer yes to these is one that will pass and, more importantly, keep people safe.

• Dust controlled at source - is on-tool or local exhaust extraction specified at the machine and tool, not just a vac in the corner?
• RPE specified - is face-fit-tested respiratory protection named for high-dust tasks, given wood dust is a carcinogen?
• Machinery competence - are the machines named, guarded, and operatives confirmed trained and competent under PUWER, with isolation before adjustment?
• Push sticks and jigs - are the controls for keeping hands clear of blades set out?
• Nail guns - is safe use covered, with safety devices kept intact and eye protection worn?
• Noise and vibration - are hearing protection and trigger-time limits set out for saws, planers and routers?
• Manual handling - are team lifts and aids specified for sheet material, doors and units?
• Working at height - for roof carpentry, joisting or high fixings, is the access and edge protection specified?
• Fire and housekeeping - is dust build-up, waste removal and clearing of offcuts and leads addressed?

Common reasons a joinery RAMS gets rejected

Knowing why documents get sent back is the fastest way to write one that does not. These are the failings an assessor sees most often on joinery RAMS.

Wood dust is treated as nuisance sawdust. The most common serious failing - no extraction at source, no face-fit-tested RPE, no recognition that hardwood dust causes cancer. An assessor who understands the WEL for wood dust will reject this.

Machinery is glossed over. "Machinery will be used safely" with no mention of guarding, push sticks, competence or isolation, for tools that cause amputations, is a frequent and serious gap.

Nail guns are ignored. Saying nothing about safe use of nail guns, given the penetrating injuries they cause, reads as a gap.

It is obviously generic. A template that does not name the actual work - first fix, second fix, roof carpentry, staircases, shopfitting - or the machines and access is a common rejection.

Working at height is missed. Roof and joisting work described with no access plan or edge protection overlooks the fall risk that work carries.

How to write a joinery RAMS that passes

A RAMS that gets approved first time shares a few features whatever the trade.

Make it specific to the job

The fastest way to get a RAMS rejected is to submit something obviously generic. Name the site, the actual work - whether it is first fix, second fix, roof carpentry, staircases, shopfitting or bench joinery - the machines and tools involved, the real access arrangements, and the specific hazards. An assessor can tell within seconds whether the document describes this job or is a template with the name changed.

Follow the sequence of work

The method statement should walk through the job in order: setting up, machine and bench arrangements, the work broken into stages, the access used, dust extraction and housekeeping, and clearing up. Each stage links to the hazards it creates and the controls that manage them.

Rate the risks honestly

The risk assessment side rates each hazard by likelihood and severity, then again after your controls are in place. This residual-risk approach follows HSE's risk assessment guidance and is what a competent assessor expects, with wood dust and machinery rated seriously rather than waved through.

Keep it readable

The people who need to follow a RAMS are the joiners and carpenters on site, not just the assessor. Plain language, a clear sequence and a short list of real controls beat pages of boilerplate nobody reads.

Doing it the fast way

Writing a full joinery RAMS by hand for every job is exactly the paperwork that eats evenings. That is the problem Complys was built to solve: answer a few questions about the job and the trade, and it generates a complete, joinery-specific risk assessment and method statement you can edit, download and share. The hazards above - wood dust, machinery, nail guns, manual handling, working at height - come built into the templates, so you start from a document that already knows the trade rather than a blank page.

If you want the wider picture first, our guide to what a RAMS is and how to write one covers the fundamentals, and the difference between a RAMS and a risk assessment clears up the most common confusion. You can also see every trade we cover on the RAMS builder hub.

However you produce it, the goal is the same: a RAMS that keeps your team safe, gets you onto site without delay, and stands up when a contractor checks it.