Fire safety guide · England

How to run and learn from fire drills in shared business premises

A useful shared-premises fire drill tests whether the building’s warning, escape and coordination arrangements work for the people actually there. Agree the exercise with the relevant Responsible Persons, include affected occupiers and shifts, observe what happens at key points, then turn shortcomings into owned actions, and verify the corrections before declaring the lesson closed.

The Home Office’s England guide says fire drills should test fire procedures where necessary and reveal how people behave and which routes they use; there is no statutory fixed frequency, and the fire risk assessment should determine the arrangement. This guide concerns joint exercises in multi-occupied commercial premises; residential blocks, healthcare and high-risk sites need different methods and expert advice. Home Office: guide for persons with duties under fire safety legislation.

Decide what the drill needs to prove

The weakest objective is “everyone out in under X minutes” without knowing why X was chosen or whether the route was safe. Timing helps diagnose delays but cannot show whether a person in a meeting room heard the alarm or a locked gate opened. Choose two or three testable objectives from the current fire risk assessment and emergency plan. For example, “confirm all three office tenants receive the building alarm, use the agreed stairs and report at the assembly process”, or “confirm evening staff can leave through the north final exit without the daytime reception team”. These tell observers what evidence to collect and make the debrief focused.

Bring the Responsible Persons into the plan

The building manager may organise the drill while separate employers remain Responsible Persons for their areas and people. Identify who coordinates the exercise, who contacts each occupier, who controls the alarm, who observes common routes and who can pause or cancel. Do not assume the landlord’s sign-off means every tenant was consulted. One occupier may have a person who needs assistance, another may operate after hours, and a third may have machinery requiring an orderly shutdown. The Home Office says tenants should not refuse to participate in drills organised by the landlord or managing agent; if a tenant cannot take part on a date, agree how that population and operating condition will be tested rather than treating the exercise as a complete building test.

Choose a proportionate method and include real working patterns

An announced drill can test a new procedure; a less predictable exercise can reveal whether routine behaviour matches training; a tabletop walk-through helps rehearse decisions but does not prove the alarm is heard. Check the building’s strategy first. Do not apply a simultaneous-evacuation drill to a premises whose assessed strategy is different without specialist direction. If the building has night staff, weekend operations or variable shifts, a single mid-morning exercise will not test them all; the Home Office says permanent night-shift and day workers should participate, notes frequency is often at least annual, but explicitly says no frequency is laid down. Do not publish a fixed interval as law.

Observe warning, movement and accountability separately

Warning: did the signal reach every relevant area and was it recognised as the fire signal, or treated as a test because frequent false alarms had undermined confidence? Movement: which exits did people use; were doors available, routes clear and signs understandable; did anyone return for belongings, use a lift contrary to the plan or cross a vehicle route? Accountability: did each occupier know who was expected on site; were visitors and contractors accounted for; did wardens, reception and the building controller communicate without contradicting one another? Capture factual observations before interpretations. “Alarm could not be heard in meeting room B with the door closed” is stronger than “staff were slow”. Do not infer from a single successful drill that every future fire would be safe. GOV.UK: offices and shops guide, practical prompts only.

Record a usable report, debrief across organisations and verify changes

A useful report distinguishes facts from recommendations and includes date, building, controller, participating organisations, occupancy, objectives, conditions, observer locations, key timestamps, route, alarm and accountability observations, immediate hazards, findings, actions, owners and verification dates, and it notes any area or shift excluded. Avoid “pass” when a material finding remains unresolved. Debrief promptly while observations are fresh and share relevant findings with all affected Responsible Persons. A report stored only in the landlord’s folder cannot improve a tenant’s induction. Separate immediate defects from longer-term improvements, since a blocked or unusable exit needs prompt management rather than a target date months away, and verify each correction in a way that matches the finding. A detailed drill-report format is an editorial management tool, not a statutory template; some older guides’ five-employee recording thresholds are superseded and must not be repeated as current law.

FAQs

How often must a shared business building run a fire drill?

The current England Home Office guide says there is no laid-down frequency. It indicates drills will often be needed at least annually and sometimes more often, and the fire risk assessment should determine satisfactory arrangements; shift workers should be included. Do not turn that into a single legal interval for every premises.

Can each tenant run a separate drill instead?

Separate exercises may test tenant-specific training but can miss the common alarm, stair, final exit and building coordination. The Home Office describes the need for coherent procedures and cooperation in multi-occupied premises; decide with the Responsible Persons and a competent assessor how the whole-building interfaces will be tested.

What if a tenant refuses to participate?

Document the concern and discuss it with the tenant as a Responsible Person; the Home Office guide says tenants should not refuse to participate in drills organised by the landlord or managing agent. Escalate unresolved coordination and get specialist advice, and do not record the whole building as tested when that tenant was absent.

Is a false alarm equivalent to a drill?

It can provide useful observations, but it was not planned to test defined objectives and may leave gaps in observation and participation. Record what happened, correct findings and decide what additional exercise is needed. Do not call it a completed drill solely to fill a calendar field.

Where Complys fits

Complys can create or modernise a premises-specific fire risk assessment, including action plans and document storage, so a current assessment sets the basis for an exercise and drill findings can trigger review. It does not provide a multi-occupier drill scheduler, observer app, automatic evacuation timer or legal sign-off. People still need to practise, observe and fix the building arrangements.

Fire risk assessment software →